基于Web of science数据库的钻井液文献计量分析
投稿时间:2020-06-02  修订日期:2020-07-27  点此下载全文
引用本文:
摘要点击次数: 65
全文下载次数: 0
作者单位E-mail
邹志飞 中国地质调查局北京探矿工程研究所 zzf_711@163.com 
周风山 中国地质大学北京材料科学与工程学院 zhoufs@cugb.edu.cn 
付帆 中国地质调查局北京探矿工程研究所  
李晓东 中国地质调查局北京探矿工程研究所  
李艳宁 中国地质调查局北京探矿工程研究所  
中文摘要:本文基于Web of Science数据库,针对2000年~2019年钻井液领域文献进行对比和可视化分析,梳理了钻井液年发文量、发文国家、研究热点和研究机构等信息。结果表明:从年发文量来看,2012年之前全球钻井液发文量增长较慢,而2012年之后钻井液发文量出现猛增。美国发文数量最多,达到1803篇,篇均被引频次达到22.06次。中国发文量为1586篇,但是篇均被引频次只有8.55,论文质量与美国差距巨大。从研究方向来看,能源燃料和工程是钻井液领域的研究重点方向。从关键词共现来看,流变性能、纳米材料、天然气水合物等是钻井液研究的相关热点。期刊《Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering》在钻井液领域的刊文量最大,达到426篇,是钻井液领域最具影响力的期刊。
中文关键词:钻井液  文献计量分析  研究热点
 
An overview of drilling fluid: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science
Abstract:This paper compared and visualized the published literature about drilling fluid from 2000 to 2019 to study the research fields, research institutions, etc. The research hotspots of drilling fluid were analyzed by Citespace. The results show that: the publications of drilling fluids have been increasing in the past 20 years, of which the United States is at the top, with a total of 1803 papers, all of which have been cited 22.06 times, indicating its influence. China published 1,586 articles on drilling fluids, but its academic level was insufficient. Engineering and energy fuels were the key research areas of drilling fluids. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering was the most authoritative journal in the field of drilling fluids and was widely recognized by the academic community.
keywords:drilling fluid  bibliometrics  research hotspots
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器